True immigration reform appears to be off the table but a recent draft policy memo could provide helpful guidance in extreme hardship cases. Once the guidance is finalized (later this year), it would clarify how USCIS would make determinations regarding extreme hardship. Under U.S. immigration law, there are several reasons that an individual may need a waiver that is based upon a showing of extreme hardship to a qualifying U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident relative.
Dallas Immigration & Naturalization Law Blog
A revised Immigration Visa Bulletin has been released by the U.S. Department of State (DOS). In coordination with DOS, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (CIS) has revised procedures for determining when applicants who are waiting to file employment-based or family-sponsored adjustment of status applications may actually file those applications. Although seemingly complicated, this new procedure will better align with procedures used by DOS for foreign nationals who seek to become U.S. permanent residents by applying for immigrant visas at U.S. consulates and embassies abroad.
Hopes of immigration reform ran high in 2013. The Senate (with 14 Republicans) passed a reform bill. That effort died in the House because of opposition by extremist Republicans. Hopes of resurrection before 2017 have been dashed by rhetoric on the Republican campaign trail. I refuse to use "his" name. One candidate is calling for a 1,250 mile fence (paid for by Mexico). The same guy wants to deport 11,000,000 undocumented immigrants (and their citizen children), and brandishing the offensive (and ignorant) term "anchor babies", wants to trump (oops!) the 14th amendment. Wow! Other candidates (who should know better) are climbing aboard. I am worried about America.
No other words and no definition or description is needed. Regardless of gender or age, every red-blooded American instantly knows what that word means and the images it evokes. Adolescent boys hang posters of the car on their wall and grown men see the car as a salve to their "mid-life crisis." Sure, over the years at various times, other American cars have been more powerful, flashier or even more expensive. But these cars were always nothing but want-to-be debutants, left with mascara streaked faces as their dates roared off into the night - four red taillights and an exhaust note that Lucifer himself would be proud of was all that could be seen and heard.
With the advent of aircraft being able to drop bombs on enemy targets in World War I, every country with a burgeoning fleet of bombers struggled with dropping bombs on target. By World War II, the combatants resorted to sending hundreds (and later in the war, thousands) of bomber aircraft over a target with the hope that a few bombs would score a lucky hit on the intended target. It was common for bombs to miss the intended target by miles! The problem was so pervasive, that British Bomber Command's strategy throughout the war was to simply target entire cities, the logic being that even bombs that miss by miles would surely still hit somewhere in the city. British Bomber Command measured its success essentially on how many German cities that it leveled. Such was British strategy that Bomber Command focused its efforts on nighttime bombing raids since the pilots and bombardiers didn't really need to see their target - the target city was below them somewhere, their exact position over the city was quite irrelevant.
The United States Army Air Corps (it was not yet called the United States Air Force) took a different approach. The U.S. believed that it could pick specific targets for ariel bombardment, such as factories, rail yards, refineries, etc. In theory, such a strategy has no downsides since fewer bombs means less men being put at risk, less material being expended and less collateral damage. But how did the U.S. intend to accomplish this strategy when bombs were missing by miles? It doesn't take much of an imagination to understand how difficult it is to drop a bomb from an aircraft moving at several hundred miles per hour, from an altitude of several thousand feet, through a turbulent atmosphere on to a target that more often than not is protected by anti-aircraft guns and pumping thousands of exploding shells into the path of the bombers.
GOP Presidential Candidates have pushed Immigration Reform to the back burner in Congress. This has, in fact, been the case since the Senate passed S744 in July 2013. GOP rhetoric related to immigration and immigrants has become exceptionally heated. And (this should come as no surprise) much of the language used by GOP Presidential hopefuls is primarily ground on the politics of fear rather than empirical evidence and facts.
The majority of Americans want immigration reform. Yesterday, as reported by Lee Davidson in the Salt Lake City Tribune, Leon Rodriguez, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), spoke to a convention of the Catholic Legal Immigration Network at the Salt Lake City Sheraton Hotel. He said that the word "justice" is completely absent from our immigration and naturalization system. According to the Director, it is time to change that. Congress should act to make the immigration system more just. "Real justice will come when we have reform," Rodriguez said. According to him, the immigration system we have today an obsolete and archaic scheme that "does not reflect our economy, does not reflect our demographics, and--above all--our values." A scheme that routinely separates immediate families is not just and does not comport with American values.
Immigration reform. THIS is more like it! Hillary Clinton goes big on immigration!
This is immigration reform? An unnecessary and potentially harmful bill introduced by Senator McCain (R-Utah) passed the Senate yesterday. This short but damaging bill is known as the "Arizona Borderlands Protection and Preservation Act" (S.750) defines "border security" to mean the continuous and integrated manned or unmanned, monitoring, sensing, or surveillance of 100 percent of Southern border" and "apprehension or turn back of all illegal entries". This bill has been opposed by AILA (American Immigration Lawyers Association) along with a broad coalition.
It has been a while since I have posted regarding immigration reform. However, I just couldn't resist. Despite the fact that the overwhelming number of Americans believe that major immigration reform is necessary, the conservatives continue to push an anti immigration agenda.